As we round the corner on yet another contamination scare – this time, peanut butter – the world has gained heightened awareness of the lax standards imposed by governmental agencies charged with the task of keeping the public safe. Safe from improper handling, safe from unintended chemical and biological contamination, and safe from overt efforts to taint the food chain. So where do we draw the line?
The scientific world has been testing the limits of genetic engineering for decades. They’ve been charged with the task of finding ways to improve the genetic resistance of crops to insects, bacteria and fungi. As knowledge and understanding of imposed genetic mutations grew, it was only a matter of time before they would turn their attention to feed animals, and that time has crept upon us.
Traditional genetic engineering took generations to perfect. Breeding stock was selected for specific characteristics and the offspring were monitored to determine the relative success of the experiment. The difficulty with traditional breeding trials, however, is firmly grounded in the root of genetics. Selective breeding intensifies breed traits: size, function, appearance and temperament, but while one desired element may improve, an undesirable trait may be magnified, as well.
Selective breeding has ...